PAN)))ARCH))Y (notes on culture and theology)
PANARCH:
Most people consider the human brain to be logical, but it’s actually inherently spiritual in its logicality. Thought is made in the collective soul of humanity, and the brain is the source of this thought since it can be split into 4 zones: Conscious (waking mind), Subconscious (factory workers behind the waking mind), Unconscious (sleeping mind), Metaconscious (consciousness aware of consciousness). This panarchy of thought that stems from this is the root of everything on earth, born from the Monad, who is the One and the Ruler of Panarchical Earth.
Panarchical Earth can be explained using dialectics in the hegelian tradition, of course, but it can be described as a conversational way of viewing the world. A patchworked vision of current affairs, societies flourishing in a 1000 year reign before the fall in Spenglerian fashion.
People have not debunked Spengler in any useful way: he continues to be right as we are headed in the dystopia that he predicted. Morality has become a telephone game for many cultures: It’s subjectivity cannot be grasped by theist or atheist hands, as attempts to understand it has resulted in either New Atheist anti-philosophy or Prosperity Gospel Creationism.
Panarchy is fluid and can drip down from any structure of thought: what is thought to not be compatible can be made compatible. Hence: the marketplace of ideas is also a version of Panarchy.
ARCHNEMESIS:
Sissy hypnosis/sissification, which I participate in, is the language of the sexually repressed. Masculinity has fragmented and splintered into many different directions, giving us femboys as well as machoism. Strictly speaking, if we thought about things in terms of static frameworks, we have not arrived at post-liberalism, but an anti-panarchy stemming from Cathedral sentiments. Sissy hypno is the feminine fusing with the masculine as it struggles to understand its Last Manness.
The establishment conservatives are asking the wrong questions. Why are things the way they are? Why have they degenerated? Life has not degenerated but fragmented. There are good and bad sides to everything in taoist thought, and we can apply this understanding to masculinity and femininity itself.
God is God is God. There is God in three persons, the Monad, the Son (Jesus) and the Unholy Spirit (Demiurge). The Son is the masculinine counterpart of the Monad, who is inherently feminine in its Perfectness. Masculinity is flawed, it’s good traits are stemming from femininity. Honesty, Beauty, Kindness, etc. are all parts of this Goodness that we should keep, the rest of the Masculine elements should be destroyed in favor of a freer culture. This is not saying that we should kill all masculine identifying individuals, as we are free to participate in gender roles whenever we want, just that the Masculine culture, as it is now, should be abolished in order to construct a new Masculinity.
90s club music (Jungle, DNB, UK Garage, Dub Techno) was an expression of the feminine filtered through masculine lens. It’s the musical equivalent of the Monad, as its perfectness stems from the fact that Dance (along with art and music) is the purest form of artful expression.
OVERNESS:
Privilege in the intersectional sense, can be understood as crossing lines. These paths of suffering connect into each other and form the basis of what makes you who you are. Some of these paths are better off then others, especially the white cisgender-heterosexual. Understanding this is one of the foundational tenets of Alt-Transness.
Alt-Transness is not intersectionality rebranded, as intersectionality right now is neoliberalism personified. We create a new intersectionality of gnostic panarchy, as rhizomatic thinking and its many spectres is haunting queer theory, and the LGBT Community in general.
Both the inclusionists and exclusionists are wrong. The inclusionists foolishly think they can destroy hate from within some people, and they want to make the Panarchical nature of life neoliberal, creating rhizomatic structures like MOGAI. The exclusionists think the problem is from free expression, not realizing that the opposite is the case, as repressed attitudes create inclusionists.
Shipping culture is a discussion in itself. The anti-shippers are continuing satanic panic modes of thought that are fragile, starting a pipeline to traditional catholicism. Most of these anti-shippers are minors, who in their fake-deepness would probably decide that the beat poets are incestual pedophilic monsters. They do not understand that fiction effects reality, but to the extent of we don’t know yet.
We are being served repackaged culture from once-revolutionary structures, made corporate. A major example of this can be made from Alt-Kid culture, themselves dressing in things that make them cool, but are actually worshiping petit-cisgenderheterosexualism.
POSTWITNESS (THE PART)
Atheism, especially New Atheism (pejoratively named Reddit Atheism, as this strand has been popularized by Reddit) is wrong, in the fact that they apply anti-philosophical thinking to their worldview, not realizing that not believing in a god is, in fact, a philosophical view. To deconstruct their flimsy theological arguments is to risk being called a creationist or a close-minded bigot. The enlightenment is both influenced by Atheism, and an influence on Atheism, as it leads to a pipeline of anti-intellectualism. Everything they do is for a constructed God, making their arguments evangelical and Last Man-like in the process